News
Opinion
The Supreme Court Is Watching Out for the Courts, Not for Trump
In rejecting the concept of the universal injunction, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the proper role of the federal courts within our constitutional system. It is not naïve or undemocratic for the courts to lead by example in adhering to the rule of law.
The blatant illegality of the president’s executive order meant immediate legal backlash. Several states and parties filed ...
The State Department could begin laying off hundreds of Washington, D.C.-based staff, according to internal correspondence.
Ten years after the Supreme Court issued its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide, Jen ...
The Supreme Court's restriction on nationwide injunctions is a radical limit on the power of the federal courts. Nothing in any federal law or the Constitution justifies it.
Arizona v. United States has been consistently applied for over a decade, but the current administration's methods may not ...
The Supreme Court just washed its hands of its role in upholding the rule of law, the foundational principle that laws are ...
Mexico can’t sue US gun manufacturers over the carnage inflicted by drug cartels because gunmakers are protected by a 2005 law that shields them from such liability, the Supreme Court ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback