We previously reported on a U.S. Supreme Court case which interpreted the evidence destruction provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley. A plurality of the Court held in Yates that destruction of fish was not ...
(with apologies to Theodor Geisel). [1] Gulf fisherman John Yates was cited by a federally-deputized Florida Fish & Wildlife officer for having caught a few red grouper that were about an inch under ...
As undersized fish don't record or preserve information, the disputed provision doesn't make it a crime to toss them overboard in an attempt to avoid a citation. This conclusion finds additional ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback