The New York Times tested “more than 60 inches worth of Subway tuna sandwiches” from California locations to determine if the sandwiches had one out of five different tuna species Digital News ...

After a class-action lawsuit was filed against Subway in January alleging that its tuna was fake, The New York Times launched an investigation on whether the allegations were true or false. In the ...

One tuna fish sandwich, please — but hold the tuna. A lab test set up by the New York Times reportedly detected no tuna DNA in 60 inches of tuna sandwiches that were examined. The experiment … ...

Subway disputes lawsuit's claims about its tuna sandwiches 00:41. Subway isn't waiting for a judge to settle recent accusations that its tuna salad doesn't include real tuna among its ingredients ...

Subway Calls Lawsuit Claiming There's No Real Tuna in Their Tuna Sandwiches and Wraps 'Baseless' The suit alleges that Subway's tuna is actually made with "a mixture of various concoctions" By.

What's True. A lawsuit filed against Subway claimed that the company does not use real tuna or fish in their sandwiches. Subway has denied the complaint and says it delivers “100% cooked tuna ...

"Subway serves 100% real, wild-caught tuna," the chain said in a statement. "The lawsuit and the plaintiff's meritless claims, which have always lacked any supporting evidence, ...

As the lab explained to Carmel, the lack of tuna DNA could mean one of two things: either there is actually no tuna in Subway tuna, or it’s already been so processed (via being cooked and mixed ...