Amid geopolitical turmoil, the top court reaffirmed states’ legal duty to cut emissions. Read more at straitstimes.com. Read ...

The Court’s advisory opinion affirms that inadequate action on climate change may violate international law. Its findings could shape the contours of debate at COP30.

The climate debate has whipsawed in recent years. Businesses frequently have been caught in the middle, with stakeholders including government regulators, activist investors, consumers, ...

This obligation arises from human rights, maritime and the customary international law, as well as the Paris Agreement and ...

Trump's attack on climate policies go against the top court's opinion, which could be used by lawyers to fight back ...

In a landmark ruling, the International Court of Justice declared that failure to act on climate change can be an ...

On July, 26, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) handed down its long-awaited Advisory Opinion on the legal ...

The International Court of Justice is preparing to hand down its first-ever opinion on climate change, seen by many as a ...

The United States said on Thursday that it was placing sanctions of officials in the Palestinian Authority and Palestine ...

The U.N.'s top court was due to set out a non-binding legal opinion on the extent of legal and financial responsibility ...

The top United Nations court will on Wednesday hand down a landmark global legal blueprint for tackling climate change that ...

Independently of the ECU’s involvement, BBC News added the following correction: An earlier version of this post contained the sentence “She says Israel must desist from killing, injuring, destroying ...