Search - Supreme Court of the United States
Date: Proceedings and Orders: Dec 09 2024: Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 15, 2025) Petition Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service: Jan 08 2025: Waiver of The City of Philadelphia of right to respond submitted.
Search - Supreme Court of the United States
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District: Case Numbers: (20 EAP 2022, 21 EAP 2022) Decision Date: November 22, 2023: Rehearing Denied: Discretionary Court Decision Date: Date: Proceedings and Orders: Feb 20 2024: Petition for a writ of …
Search - Supreme Court of the United States
Stanford Law School Supreme Court Clinic 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305 [email protected] (650) 724-7081: Party name: Intervenor Support Center for Child Advocates and Philadelphia Family Pride: Deepak Gupta: Gupta Wessler PLLC 1900 L Street, NW Suite 312 Washington, DC 20036 [email protected] (202) 888-1741
In the Supreme Court of the United States DIANE ZILKA, PETITIONER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, TAX REVIEW BOARD ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE ELIZABETH B. PRELOGAR Solicitor General Counsel of Record DAVID A. HUBBERT Deputy Assistant Attorney General CURTIS E ...
This Court's precedents make clear that when the government is acting as sovereign using its regulatory authority, like when it's applying a city-wide Fair Practices Ordinance or the ordinances in Lukumi, then the Court does the normal Free Exercise Clause analysis. The same thing is true when the City is deciding at Heritage Reporting Corporation
Dec 23, 2024 · Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Undersigned counsel, Mr. Mills has multiple competing obligations in capital cases that make it impossible to competently complete the petition in the given timeframe. In capital cases, Mr. Mills is …
In the decision below, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled narrowly that Pennsylvania’s statutory requirement that mail-in ballots be received by Election Day violates the Pennsylvania Constitution’s Free and Equal Elections Clause as applied in the extraordinary circumstances that attend the 2020 general election.
This Court has summarily reversed when a federal court failed to afford “ a presumption of correctness” to a state court’s factual findings in a habeas case.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s ruling creates an acknowledged conflict among state supreme courts on an important issue concerning it how states cred taxpayers’ out-of-state tax liabilities under the Com-merce Clause. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s conclusion that states are required to consider state
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Ramma R. Mineo, Esquire, hereby certify that on this day I am serving a true copy of the foregoing Brief for Respondent in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari upon the person(s) in the manner indicated below, incompliance with the Supreme Court Rule 29: